New York Dems blast ‘dangerous’ Supreme Court gun ruling

Mayor Eric Adams led New York’s prime elected officers in excoriating the Supreme Court docket for overturning a century-old state gun legislation — warning at a Thursday press convention that “this choice has made each single considered one of us much less secure from gun violence.”

“There isn’t any place within the nation this choice impacts as a lot as New York Metropolis,” Adams stated in response to the 6-3 ruling, which he added was “simply not rooted in actuality.”

In a separate assertion, Hizzoner vowed: “This choice might have opened an extra river feeding the ocean of gun violence, however we are going to do every thing we will to dam it.”

Adams stated his administration had been getting ready for the choice and deliberate to do a “complete evaluate” of learn how to outline “delicate areas,” or locations the place carrying a gun might be legally banned.

The mayor added that he would additionally evaluate town’s software course of “to make sure that solely those that are absolutely certified can receive a carry license.”

The Sullivan Act, which has been on the books since 1913, required New Yorkers who wished to get a license to hold a handgun in public to indicate “correct trigger” that the weapon was wanted particularly for self-defense.

The New York State Rifle and Pistol Affiliation and two upstate males challenged the legislation, claiming it violated their Second Modification rights.

Mayor Eric Adams
Mayor Eric Adams is anxious how the Supreme Court docket choice may open a “sea of gun violence” within the Huge Apple.
Paul Martinka

On Thursday, Justice Clarence Thomas sided with the plaintiffs and wrote the legislation’s necessities “violates the Fourteenth Modification by stopping law-abiding residents with abnormal self-defense wants from exercising their proper to maintain and bear arms in public.”

Throughout a press convention in Manhattan, Gov. Kathy Hochul known as the choice “not simply reckless” however “reprehensible” and “not what New Yorkers need.”

“My primary precedence is to maintain New Yorkers secure, however at this time, the Supreme Court docket is sending us backwards in our efforts to guard households and forestall gun violence and it’s significantly painful that this got here down at this second the place we’re nonetheless coping with households in ache from mass shootings which have occurred,” Hochul instructed reporters.

Gov. Kathy Hochul
Gov. Kathy Hochul argued the Supreme Court docket is “sending us backwards” on stopping gun violence.
Robert Miller

“I’m sorry this darkish day has come the place we’re supposed to return to what was in place in 1788, when the Structure of the USA of America was ratified,” she continued.

“I don’t assume [the Founding Fathers] envisioned the high-capacity assault weapon magazines, supposed for battlefield, as lined, however I suppose we’re simply going to must disagree.”

When requested if she would name the state legislature again to Albany to craft a legislative response to the choice, Hochul stated officers wanted a second to digest the ruling, however later promised: “That is New York. We don’t again down. We battle again.”

Anti-scaling fencing is seen outside the Supreme Court, Thursday, June 23, 2022, in Washington.
In a 6-3 majority choice, ​the Supreme Court docket struck down on New York’s century-old legislation proscribing the carrying of hid firearms.
AP Photograph/Jacquelyn Martin

Manhattan District Legal professional Alvin Bragg stated the choice “severely undermines” public security within the Huge Apple – and across the nation.

“Whereas the Court docket has now made it harder to restrict the variety of weapons in our communities, I’m dedicated to doing every thing in my energy to battle for the security everybody on this metropolis deserves, and now we have been getting ready for this choice for weeks,” Bragg stated.

State Senate Majority Chief Andrea Stewart-Cousins (D-Westchester) vowed in a press release that New York “will rise as much as this newest problem to move extra gun security laws.”

Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg
Manhattan District Legal professional Alvin Bragg claims the Supreme Court docket choice will enable extra weapons on the streets.
Gabriella Bass

“The Supreme Court docket at this time determined that weapons are extra vital than lives on this nation. At present’s choice reinforces the truth that states should step as much as defend our residents greatest pursuits and prepared the ground on vital reform,” Stewart-Cousins stated.

Former Mayor Michael Bloomberg shared his ideas on Twitter, saying the ruling will make it tougher for elected officers to fight gun violence.

“The Supreme Court docket’s opinion on NY State Pistol & Rifle Affiliation v. Bruen is totally out of contact and reveals an excessive imaginative and prescient for all times within the US,” Bloomberg tweeted.

State Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins
State Senate Majority Chief Andrea Stewart-Cousins promised the state legislature will to implement “gun security laws.”
Gregory P. Mango

New York’s leaders in Washington had blended emotions on the ruling.

Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-NY) hailed the choice, declaring it “strengthens” Second Modification rights within the Empire State.

“Because the defund the police motion goes mainstream within the Democrat Social gathering and failed progressive insurance policies like bail reform make our streets much less secure, it’s extra vital than ever to make sure law-abiding People can correctly defend themselves inside and outside of their houses,” Tenney stated in a press release

Republican gubernatorial candidate Rep. Lee Zeldin agreed.

Former NYC mayor Mike Bloomberg
Former Mayor Michael Bloomberg blasted the Supreme Court docket as “out of contact” for overturning New York’s century-long firearm rule.
Matthew McDermott

“At present, the USA Supreme Court docket dominated in protection of the Constitutional rights of law-abiding New Yorkers who’ve been below assault for a lot too lengthy,” Zeldin stated.

In the meantime, Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-NY) tweeted that the ruling was “a direct assault on the security of thousands and thousands of New Yorkers, and can lead to extra harmful weapons in our communities.”

Lawmakers within the 5 boroughs fumed over the ruling as they pointed to town’s gun disaster that’s left behind a bloody path of harmless victims.

“At present’s Supreme Court docket ruling increasing gun entry is devastating,” said Metropolis Councilman Keith Powers (D- East Facet).

“Regardless of the nonstop tragedies, this choice solely makes it simpler to hold a hid firearm in New York.”

Metropolis Council Speaker Adrienne Adams stated the physique was “ready to take motion to guard New Yorkers.”

“The Supreme Court docket’s choice to overturn New York’s gun legal guidelines is harmful and places New Yorkers in danger,” she stated.

“Our nation and metropolis are already dealing with a gun violence disaster, and this ruling solely threatens to worsen the hurt inflicted on our communities.”

Public Advocate Jumaane Williams, who’s difficult Hochul within the Democratic gubernatorial main, known as the ruling “painful and harmful information.”

“NY already has method too many weapons on our streets, so we want clear and instant motion from Albany, beginning with the $1b funding we’ve known as for to deal with day by day avenue violence—as a substitute of the $1b giveaway for a billionaire’s stadium,” he tweeted.

Even disgraced ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo chimed in to share his ideas on the ruling.

“That is one other devastating setback in our battle towards gun violence and it solely underscores the necessity for bolder gun reforms on the nationwide degree. Due to this ruling, we’re now again to the place we have been in 1910, however it doesn’t have to stay this manner,” stated Cuomo.

“Not solely ought to combatting this choice be a part of any closing gun package deal earlier than Congress, however so ought to assault weapon and excessive capability journal bans. Permitting unchecked hid handguns in cities throughout the nation will solely enhance the variety of lives misplaced to gun violence and avoiding actual motion to forestall extra mass shootings like what occurred in Buffalo and Uvalde will solely result in additional mindless bloodshed. The American folks have already suffered an excessive amount of.”

Extra reporting by Nolan Hicks

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.